Dear Defra Wiki user,
The questions and answers below are intended only as a starting point for the development of the environmental contract. Please amend or add to them as you think necessary.
To edit the text you just need to click on 'edit page' at the top right of the screen.
If you would like to explain why you've made certain changes or discuss changes made by others please use the comments box at the bottom of this page rather than add them to the main text.
If you'd like to know more about the thinking behind the environment contract or Wikis in general the WikiHome page has all the background.
Thanks,
Wiki Admin
What is this environmental contract for?
We believe that the environmental problems we face, particularly climate change, represent the gravest threat to human life and prosperity, and to the natural resources and assets on which it depends.
We believe that current levels of western consumption are unsustainable, and that what we cannot and will not extend to every citizen of the planet should not form the basis of our modern existence.
We believe that each of us has the capacity to play a part in tackling these problems. But too often we are dissuaded from doing so by doubts about whether our actions will make any difference, and whether they will leave us unfairly disadvantaged.
We propose this environmental contract as a way to assuage such doubts, by creating a framework which makes clear our own responsibilities towards the environment, and the responsibilities we can expect others to bear in return.
Who are the parties to the environmental contract?
All are welcome to take part but it is too late to wait for the unconvinced. Action must begin today and from this action it is hoped that others will be inspired to play their part in the process.
What are the principles on which the environmental contract should be based?
An environmental contract should be based on the following principles:
-
Reciprocity: government won't ask citizens or businesses to do anything without saying clearly what it is going to do in return.
-
Subsidiarity: environmental contracts should be negotiated at the lowest appropriate level. Sometimes that will be global or supranational, other times local.
-
Equity: costs should be allocated fairly. Polluters should pay; environmental stewards should be rewarded; countries that have made a bigger historical contribution to pollution have a correspondingly greater obligation to respond to it.
-
Empowerment: as far as possible environmental contracts should be designed to maintain individuals' and business' freedom to choose how to live their lives provided they bear the full cost of those choices; choices should be informed; where possible choices should 'edited' rather than removed altogether.
-
Convenience: being a good environmental citizen should become the default option; wherever possible citizens should be asked to opt-out not opt-in.
What tools can be used to deliver the environmental contract?
To deliver the environmental contract, we believe policy-makers need to use a range of different approaches and tools.
These tools need to:
-
Remove some barriers and put in place others
-
Create the right incentive frameworks to shape individual choices
-
Communicate and engage with people effectively
-
Show that government practises what it preaches
-
Not scare people with horror stories of environmental degradation so they feel any positive steps are pointless
Tools that remove barriers include:
-
Providing simple, trustworthy and timely advice and information
-
Offering more convenient personalised services and making sure that such conveniences do not increase environmental damage.
Tools that put in place barriers include:
Tools that create the right incentive frameworks include:
-
Environmental taxes and charges
-
Emissions trading schemes
-
Regulating product standards
-
Voluntary agreements
-
Bonuses for good environmental practice, not just penalties
Tools that communicate and engage with people effectively include:
Tools that show that government practises what it preaches include:
-
Sustainable public procurement with the widest possible reach
-
Politicians modelling good environmental behaviours
-
Public places (e.g. schools, hospitals, universities) encouraged to show environmental awareness
What would an environmental contract for waste look like?
Citizens will:
-
separate household wastes and use the facilities provided
-
pay variable charges depending on the amount of waste their household produces and how much they recycle
-
encourage their neighbours
-
think about waste when purchasing e.g. food
-
recognise the need for facilities to extract energy from waste
-
respect the environment by not flytipping
-
not just recycle but re-use
-
get involved in clean-up volunteering
In return, government will:
-
collect your rubbish and clean streets
-
provide convenient, personalised “kerbside” recycling facilities
-
give simple advice to customers on what they can recycle
-
create arrangements for variable charging
-
place obligations on key sectors to reduce waste from their products
-
reward neighbourhoods that agree to situating waste facilities in their area
-
participate in trading schemes aimed at reducing landfill
-
prosecute the perpetrators of environmental crime and take local flytipping seriously
Businesses will:
-
respect general and sector specific waste regulations
-
pay landfill taxes
-
identify opportunities to increase resource productivity and use waste as a resource
-
look for ways to minimise waste, e. g. from packaging, direct mailing, etc.
-
implement a 'green dot' system making it easy for consumers to see which products have not used too much packaging (system already in place in Germany)
-
start collecting used bottles and packaging then clean it and re-use (like the milkman)
-
run 'sustainability training' schemes for staff to attend - there are now several companies offering such training
-
provide recycling facilities in the workplace
In return government will
-
incentivise business to use less weight through landfill tax
-
provide advice and support programmes
-
not be afraid to legislate to deal with problems such as plastic bag use
-
enforce regulations to prevent other businesses free riding
-
tax breaks for collecting and re-using old material like bottles
What would an environmental contract for energy look like?
Citizens will:
-
be prepared to pay the full cost of the energy they use, adjusted for damage to health and the environment
-
turn off lights, televisions, heating, computers when not in use
-
turn heating down and wear more clothes in winter
-
not heat water so often
-
remove all phone chargers and other drains from socket when not in use
-
purchase energy-efficient cars
-
travel more by public transport and cycle
-
think carefully before flying
-
install solar panels and small wind turbines
Government will:
-
provide a framework for emissions trading so that the full cost of energy to society is embedded in its price to the consumer
-
switch off lights, fans, computers, heating, air conditioning in government offices overnight
-
make sure public and private enterprises ensure staff switch off lights when not needed
-
publicise schemes like London Cycling Campaign more widely
-
provide more subsidies for solar panels, wind turbines etc.
-
fund research to demonstrate which of the above energy-saving and emission-reduction options work best
Businesses will:
-
publicise to staff the need to save electricity
-
install energy-saving light bulbs
-
make sure electric devices lapse into energy-saving mode when not used
-
construct all new buildings energy-efficiently
What would an environmental contract for transport look like?
Citizens will:
Government will:
Businesses will:
What would an environmental contract for water look like?
Government will:
-
ensure safe, clean drinking water
-
set clear, stretching standards for water efficient homes and buildings
-
use water efficiently on its own estate
Citizens will
Businesses will
|
| Page: | WikiHome |
| Revision: | 214 |
| Last edited: | 01/05/2007 08:29AM (01/05/2007) |
| Edited by: | admin |
|
This wiki has been retained for reference purposes - but further editing is not encouraged. |
To control the editing of the material on the wiki we’ve introduced a registration process – so that content can only be edited by people who’ve registered with us. See below for details.We welcome all comment – provided it’s constructive, relevant and, not abusive – we ourselves will not delete material or comments that meet these requirements.
|
What is a 'Wiki'?
A wiki is a website which can be edited by anyone, without knowing the technicalities of webpage design, such as HTML or CSS (see also Wikipedia's definition). This Defra wiki is being used as an experiment in collaborative working.
In particular, we want stakeholders' help in developing the idea of an 'Environmental Contract'. This Wiki will allow people directly to input into the process of drafting the contract.
|
NOTE – we do not guarantee that other users will not be able to view the information – username and email address – for accounts created on this wiki. Acceptance of this is a condition of registration.
Please read our "Terms and Conditions". If you would like to make changes, then go to ‘edit page’ at the top right of the screen. If you are having any difficulties, see the training materials and frequently asked questions (opens in new window) from the company behind our wiki software, or contact us at Defra.
We ask that users do not make changes to this homepage, as it is necessary to keep this page clear and simple, particularly for new users. We ask users NOT to delete other users’ comments unless they are e.g. “spam” or abusive in some way.
The links below take you to the different pages of this wiki.
|
How to get started
The registration process is quick and simple:
Go to the “self registration” page
Type in your email address
An account will automatically be created based on the name in (but not including the full details of) your email address
A confirmation email will be sent to that email address – once you receive this email, you must go to the website link in the email in order to activate your wiki account
Make a note of your username and password – we do not expect to fix people’s passwords whenever they forget them!
After you’ve logged in to the wiki, you should be able to edit pages and add comments.
NOTE – we do not guarantee that other users will not be able to view the information – username and email address – for accounts created on this wiki. Acceptance of this is a condition of registration.
Please read our "Terms and Conditions". If you would like to make changes, then go to ‘edit page’ at the top right of the screen. If you are having any difficulties, see the training materials and frequently asked questions (opens in new window) from the company behind our wiki software, or contact us at Defra.
We ask that users do not make changes to this homepage, as it is necessary to keep this page clear and simple, particularly for new users. We ask users NOT to delete other users’ comments unless they are e.g. “spam” or abusive in some way.
The links below take you to the different pages of this wiki.
|
Key information - terms and conditions etc:
Contacting us
If you wish to draw any possible misuse to our attention you may contact us, during working hours, as follows:
- send us an e-mail at: sdudiv@defra.gsi.gov.uk or
- write to us at, Sustainable Development Unit, Defra, 4E, 9 Millbank, c/o Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR
- or call us on +44 (0)20 7238 5811
Drug Treatment Programs: An Overview Drug abuse is among the major problems of American society nowadays. This predicament storms America by breaking families up, destroying lives, and costing billion dollars for health care and such expenses in the process. In fact, the National Survey on Drug Abuse and Health states that more than 20 million citizens suffer from drug addiction. However, almost 100% of these citizens either are in denial or are unaware of their drug disorders. This is the reason why they usually reject any help or treatment related to drug abuse. The government, however, does not stop with the billions it spends every year. Instead, the government provides the necessary help for all its citizens who have fallen prey to addiction, and this help comes in the form of drug treatment programs. Treatment does not necessarily mean drug rehabs or hospitalization because drug addiction treatment varies depending on the physical status of the patient.Types of Drug Treatment ProgramThere are nine types of addiction treatment programs, but the most popular includes Agonist Maintenance Program, Outpatient Drug-Free Program, Short-Term Residential Program, Long-Term Residential Program, and Medical Detoxification. The first type addiction program is referred to as methadone treatment program, for it uses methadone as the primary medication that counters the dangerous effects of opiates. Moreover, this treatment also includes group counseling or psychological therapy.Meanwhile, the Outpatient Drug-Free Treatment emphasizes the effectiveness of group counseling in curing drug addicts. Aside from a person's drug disorder, this type of treatment also aims to cure that person's psychological health problems. Likewise, the Long-Term Residential Treatment and the Short-Term Residential Programs also aim to cure a person's mental problems and drug disorder. The difference of these two programs from the outpatient treatment, however, lies in the location because the two take place in the patient's residence. Lastly, medical detoxification is the most unique among the above-mentioned types of addiction treatment. Unlike those methods that focus on the psychological aspect, this type centers on the physiological backlash of drug abuse. Medical detoxification can take place in a rehab or at the patient's home provided a physician is present whenever the addiction treatment occurs.What the Family Can DoWhen the patient does not want to go to drug rehabs for treatment, this is when his family comes in the scene. Convincing can be difficult for the family if the patient is unwilling to seek help, or he is denying about his drug problem. However, there are ways that the family can do to help the patient recover from such predicament. The most important thing that the family can do is to get help from experts, and this can be done by applying for a family drug intervention. In such case, the family learns about drug intervention which is the process of helping the patient accept his drug disorder and persuading him to overcome such problem by getting professional help.While some people may argue that only doctors can cure drug addiction, experts believe otherwise. Even though drug treatment programs are provided by experts to help drug addicts, the success of the treatment does not depend on the programs alone but more importantly on his family. sources:http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/treat/treatment.htmlhttp://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov/treat/screen_brief_intv.html
|
| Page: | Comment261 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 28/04/2007 12:12PM (28/04/2007) |
| Edited by: | bryan |
Ares is a free open source file sharing program that enables users to share any digital file including images, audio, video, software, documents. The latest versions of ares free music downloads support Bittorent protocol and shoutcast radio stations.
If online sales are any indication, the number of people who are actively shopping online is also on the rise. According to Forrester Research, online sales reached a staggering $172 billion in 2005--a number they predict will rise to $329 billion by 2010! For motivated individuals looking for some of the best online home based business opportunities
|
| Page: | Comment246 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 25/04/2007 12:33AM (25/04/2007) |
| Edited by: | josh |
A film not mentioned here but also has a lot of unbiased information about how we all pollute the environment is called "The corporation" by Mark Achbar, Jennifer Abbott & Joel Bakan. It's basically a documentary on the pollution of businesses, and a few ideas of what we can do it. I don't mean to pump it up, but it's really eye opening on many different levels. Surely this will be a huge issue this coming elections in the United States... which in turn effects the rest of the world.
-Josh
*Update... I just read that the documentary is available for free on Google video.
|
| Page: | Comment236 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 23/04/2007 08:52AM (23/04/2007) |
| Edited by: | brazzb |
How can one country or a few countries create a Water Contract for the entire world?
I live in Brazil, the country with the largest reservoir of drinkable water in the world. The Government here is not as much concerned with water as you British are; the Government here has other priorities, like Education, Health, Violence , etc (read @ http://www.v-brazil.com/ Social Issues). Meanwhile, the water reservoirs are gradually being degraded.
You are concerned with cleaning glasses, while the buckets of water are dirty.
|
| Page: | tr0 |
| Revision: | 5 |
| Last edited: | 15/04/2007 02:32PM (15/04/2007) |
| Edited by: | mastercobrapl |
|
| Page: | GJ Meeting Minutes |
| Revision: | 2 |
| Last edited: | 07/03/2007 11:43PM (07/03/2007) |
| Edited by: | goldenjubilee |
|
|
| Page: | Discussion |
| Revision: | 7 |
| Last edited: | 17/10/2006 03:56AM (17/10/2006) |
| Edited by: | phil |
What do you think?
Although we are interested in the look of the final contract, we are also interested in the various opinions and debates that contribute to it. This is the place to capture them: questions you have, things you agree or disagree with in the main text or facts you think others should be aware. Related topics
|
An environmental contract for water
Citizens will:
-
monitorthink about water usage in their homes and act to reduce it
-
turn off taps when not using them
-
have fewer baths
-
change water fittings for those with lower water use
-
use rainwater for watering garden etc
-
obey restrictions on water usage in times of water stress.
Government will:
-
ensure adequate supplies of safe, clean, affordable drinking water
-
regulate to ensure that new and renovated buildings incorporate water saving features as standard
-
work with the industry and the regulator to tackle leakage and waste
-
promote efficient use of water
-
provide and install rainwater storage systems for citizens on a cost recovery basis
-
commission research into the effects of climate change on the availability and quality of water in the UK
-
ensure that planning authorities are obliged to take into account availability of water when considering planning applications
-
work with the farming industry and environmental regulators to tackle the problem of diffuse water pollution from agriculture
- take water resources and drought (and other environmental limits) clearly and transparently into account when proposing house building levels for regions and arguing for an appropriate balance betwen the north and the south of the country
|
| Page: | EnvironmentContract |
| Revision: | 186 |
| Last edited: | 09/10/2006 06:39AM (09/10/2006) |
| Edited by: | martin |
|
Dear Defra Wiki user,
The questions and answers below are intended only as a starting point for development of the environmental contract. Please amend or add to them as you think necessary.
To edit the text you just need to click on 'edit page' at the top right of the screen.
If you would like to explain why you've made certain changes or discuss changes made by others please use the comments box at the bottom of this page rather than add them to the main text.
If you'd like to know more about the thinking behind the environment contract or Wikis in general the WikiHome page has links to the background.
Thanks,
Wiki Administrator |
What is this environmental contract for?
We believe that the environmental problems we face, particularly climate change, represent the gravest threat to human life and prosperity, and to the natural resources and assets on which it depends.
We believe that current levels of western consumption are unsustainable, and that what we cannot and will not extend to every citizen of the planet should not form the basis of our modern existence.
We believe that each of us has the capacity to play a part in tackling these problems and that action by individuals will be needed. But too often we are dissuaded from doing so by doubts about whether our actions will make any difference, and whether they will leave us unfairly disadvantaged.
We propose this environmental contract as a way to overcome such doubts, by creating a framework which makes clear our own responsibilities towards the environment, and the responsibilities we can expect others to bear in return and the actions we can expect them to undertake.
Who are the parties to the environmental contract?
The contract is between citizens and their government. All are welcome to take part but it is too late to wait for the unconvinced. Action must begin today and from this action it is hoped that others will be inspired to play their part in the process.
What are the principles on which the environmental contract should be based?
An environmental contract should be based on the following principles:
- Reciprocity: government won't ask citizens or businesses to do anything without saying clearly what it is going to do in return, without committing to provide the necessary infrastructure, information and support systems and without explaining clearly why something needs to be done.
- Subsidiarity: environmental contracts should be negotiated at the lowest appropriate level. Sometimes that will be global or supranational, sometimes national, other times local.
- Equity: costs and benefits should be allocated fairly. Polluters should pay; environmental stewards should be rewarded; those who have made a bigger historical contribution to pollution have a correspondingly greater obligation to respond to it.
- Empowerment: as far as possible the environmental contract should be designed to encourage individual action; choices should be informed; and options judged unacceptable through a transparent and democratic process should be excluded.
- Convenience: being a good environmental citizen should become the easy option, enabling environmentally friendly behaviour to be the default; wherever possible citizens should be made to opt-out of environmentally unfriendly behaviour not obliged to opt-in.
What tools can be used to deliver the environmental contract?
To deliver the environmental contract, we believe policy-makers need to use a range of different approaches and tools.
These tools need to:
Tools that remove barriers include:
-
Providing simple, trustworthy and timely information.
-
Offering convenient and well targeted personal advice and support for action.
-
Providing essential infrastructure
-
Equipping people with necessary skills
Tools that create the right incentive frameworks include:
-
Environmental taxes and charges
-
Grant schemes for working towards environmental targets
-
Emissions trading schemes and other market based incentive schemes
-
Product standard regulations -- and a clear forward path
-
Voluntary and negotiated agreements
-
removal of subsidies to environmentally unfriendly behaviour
Tools that communicate and engage with people effectively include:
Tools that show that government practises what it preaches include:
-
Sustainable public procurement
-
Politicians modelling good environmental behaviours
-
Setting high sustainability standards when disposing of land for development
-
Adequate funding for information, advice and support services
-
A clear framework for assessing and improving the sustainability performance of local and central Government
What would an environmental contract for waste look like?
Citizens will:
-
separate household wastes and use the facilities provided
-
pay variable charges depending on the amount of waste their household produces and how much they recycle
-
use compostors to recycle garden and some household waste
-
encourage their neighbours
-
think about waste when purchasing e.g. food as well as using products appropriately
-
recognise the need for facilities to extract energy from waste
In return, government will:
-
collect your rubbish and clean streets
-
provide convenient, personalised “kerbside” recycling facilities
-
give simple advice to customers on what they can recycle
-
insist that recycling and waste contractors stick to a code of conduct on what is collected and what is not collected
-
offer composting products to citizens on a cost recovery basis
-
create arrangements for variable charging
-
place obligations on key sectors to reduce waste from their products
-
reward neighbourhoods that agree to situating waste facilities in their area
-
participate in trading schemes aimed at reducing landfill
Businesses will:
In return government will
-
incentivise business to use less weight through landfill tax
-
provide advice and support programmes
-
enforce regulations to prevent other businesses free riding
-
work with the packaging industry to reduce packaging waste/ increase recyclability
-
work with retailers to reduce waste at source
What would an environmental contract for energy look like?
Citizens will:
- insulate homes they own
- buy the most efficient lights and appliances
- reduce unnecessary energy use, e.g by turning off appliances when not used
- choose low carbon modes of transport where available
- buy the lowest carbon vehicles appropriate for their needs
- drive efficiently
- consider using new green technologies such as microgeneration where affordable
- encourage their family, friends and neighbours to do all these things
In return government will
specifically -
- educate and incentivise staff to turn off the lights, computers, etc. in government buildings when not in use overnight (1)
-
support organisations and networks that deliver change at the local level
-
continue to use the tax system to encourage subsidise energy-saving choices
-
support businesses to green their consumer products and services, including through energy regulation, and
-
regulate to remove from the market products that are unnecessarily energy wasters.
(1) relevant article in the Independent, 6 Oct 2006(2) copied from the contract for water. If it applies there, why not here? (Playing devil's advocate!)
What would an environmental contract for sustainable finance look like?
Citizens will:
- understand the impact of their savings and investments on environment and society;
- spend the financial gains from their savings and investments in a sustainable manner;
- explore ways that they can use their investments to support sustainable businesses and promote one planet living;
- ensure that their voice is heard by voting at company annual general meetings in a way that supports sustainable business;
- check that their fund manager is actively voting their shares in a way that is consistent with the principles of one planet living;
- request regular reports on the responsible ownership actions of their product providers;
- ask fund managers for the portfolio of companies where their money is invested and check that the companies in these portfolios are consistent with their own principles;
- encourage neighbours to think about the environment when saving and investing.
In return, government will:
- provide access to high quality information on how savings and investments impact on environment and society;
- ensure that consumers are asked whether they would want advice on one planet finance as part of their general financial advice;
- give simple advice to customers on what information they should ask financial institutions to provide;
- provide better access to information to consumers on company voting to individual investors.
The finance sector will:
- provide a range of sustainable savings and investment products that support one planet living;
- expand the range of financial products in which environmental and social factors are taken into account integrate environmental and social considerations within ‘mainstream’ financial analysis and decision making;
- be long-term in the way that it analyses companies and ensure that it does not actively encourage company directors to externalise costs on the environment;
- seek to grow assets under management in specialist sustainable and responsible investment funds (including both negatively and positively screened funds);
- bring market failures that are detrimental to sustainable development to the attention of government policy makers, and support corrective action;
- formally recognise in policy statements that there are responsibilities of share ownership that arise from electing company directors to represent their interests, including challenging and supporting these directors to ensure that the company is developing in a sustainable way;
- uphold the responsibilities of share ownership by actively voting at company annual general meetings;
- be transparent to its clients by providing information on performance, portfolio and votes;
- identify opportunities to increase resource productivity, reduce energy consumption and minimise waste.
In return government will
- give public recognition to financial institutions that practice sustainable and responsible investment;
- incentivise sustainable and responsible finance through fiscal measures;
- focus on changing investment culture and building long term sustainable mandates;
- launch a sustainable investment task force;
- enforce regulations to prevent other financial institutions free riding on the responsible ownership activity of others;
- provide advice and support programmes to the finance sector, including specific guidance for pensions schemes promoting the production of an annual report explaining what actions have been taken in support of the social, ethical and environmental clause within the Statement of Investment Principles;
- not be afraid to legislate to deal with market failures in a way that enhances long term investment returns;
- ensure that all government funds are invested in a sustainable and responsible way;
- use all future public procurement of investment services to deliver Government policy commitments to sustainable development through markets
- sustain the DEFRA/DTI/HMT focus on environmental technologies (including renewable energy, water treatment, waste management etc) and sustainable production and consumption.
See also
|
| Page: | Comment219 |
| Revision: | 2 |
| Last edited: | 05/10/2006 01:07AM (05/10/2006) |
| Edited by: | phil |
There was an interview on Newsnight the other night which got at the apparent discrepancy between what the government says and what it does on climate change. Like probably some others, I wonder what Churchill would have made of the state we're in. What questions would he have been asking that the rest of us can't or don't want to see? I can't help thinking that the one thing he would have seen was the need to mobilise the British people and their friends and allies in the commonwealth of nations. If a government really saw this as the greatest threat to mankind wouldn't it be falling over itself to help local communities lead the way to the broad sunlit uplands of a low carbon future? See also
|
The idea of an environmental contract may open up possibilities. Expressed as an understanding between government and citizens, it explicitly involves the latter. Whether or not it genuinely opens up possibilities depends on what type of role the government can envisage for citizens.Since the contraction of Local Agenda 21, the field of sustainable development in England seems to have been dominated by professional and expert, remote and establishment elites.To ordinary citizens and community groups interested in sustainability, recent government and establishment initiatives can seem like forever rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic. No matter how cleverly experts talk amongst themselves, there won' t be enough progress till there's genuine involvement and inclusion of ordinary citizens.This is most apparent at the local level, but the good thing is that it's here that there's probably the greatest potential to turn things around.There's been a lot of rhetoric recently about devolution and localism, but much practice can seem to remain top-down - however much people may object to that term. (Perhaps people object to it because it hits the nail on the head?)For ordinary people and community groups to get genuine involvement and so achieve genuine influence, there must be fewer and fewer no-go areas - specifically the joined-up and the strategic. Because genuine sustainability must be about both of these, shallow, superficial, single-issue, piecemeal, tokenistic, short-term or otherwise unsustained community involvement initiatives just won't be enough."Our central recommendation is that communications should be redefined across government to mean a continuous dialogue with all interested parties, encompassing a broader range of skills and techniques than those associated with media relations. The focus of attention should be the general public." - recommendation no. 1 of the Phillis report, January 2004ReferencesSee also
|
| Page: | Comment218 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 04/10/2006 03:52AM (04/10/2006) |
| Edited by: | phil |
Hi Martin, Thanks for your comment. I wanted to keep the first sentence fairly brief and clear, for readability, (and accessibility, especially to ordinary citizens!) not trying to say it all in the first phrase, but have added "as an essential minimum" to clarify. Please fee free to redraft yourself if you think you can improve it.
|
What would an environmental contract for local sustainability look like?First and foremost, and as an essential minimum, foremost it would give a role to all stakeholders passionate about sustainability.Each local community would have a Quality of Life Forum (QLF), open to all and genuinely inclusive (1) inclusive.In terms of an environmental contract, put simply:Citizens would engage in Quality of LIfe ForumsifGovernment ensured that such engagement was properly valued, respected and resourced.Quality of Life Forums would have a role not just in planning for sustainability (as happened via Local Agenda 21) but also in its delivery, and crucially in monitoring, evaluating and auditing this delivery - holding everyone to account.Local Agenda 21 at its best gave a wide variety of stakeholders a tantalising first glimpse of community empowerment. If sustainability is ever to become a reality for local communities, government has at some stage to evolve beyond the limitations of representative government and embrace more participatory democracy.The former tends to be about the words, whereas the latter, if properly inclusive, could be more about the deeds. To borrow from the title of another government initiative, Together We Can.(1) including those as Martin suggests below who's interest may be awakeningReferences:- This article was first published on the Sustainable Community Action wiki
- How can Community Strategies be turned into Sustainable Community Strategies? Phil Green, October 2005, comment article on the Sustainable Community Action wiki
See also
|
| Page: | Comment217 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 04/10/2006 01:47AM (04/10/2006) |
| Edited by: | martin |
Phil, I am not sure that "a role to all stakeholders passionate about sustainability" is very inclusive. What about those who are "a bit concerned about" or "slightly interested in" sustainability. I suggest that you reword.
Martin
|
| Page: | Comment216 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 26/09/2006 08:10AM (26/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | martin |
I am unhappy with the requirement for government to, "ensure adequate supplies of safe, clean, affordable drinking water." Firstly there is no obvious definition of "adequate" or "affordable". Second, short of legislating for rainfall, I do not see how Government can "ensure" it. Perhaps if we started with the definitions we would then be able to see what powers Government could have over it. Anyone any suggestions?
|
| Page: | Comment215 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 22/09/2006 07:21AM (22/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | EnvironmentAdmin |
Thank you for your comment regarding splitting the sections to make the site user friendly, we will look into this shortly. regards
|
| Page: | Comment214 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 22/09/2006 07:19AM (22/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | EnvironmentAdmin |
Message posted on behalf of URS corporation
It is not clear why a contract would be a better tool than other regulatory tools. Also how the requirements of the contract would be enforced and what happens when either party does not fulfill their requirements is not explained.
Green purchasing would benefit from better coverage in the current draft. This would involve a commitment from citizens to consider environmental impacts when purchasing products/services and to make changes to their purchasing habits. Government would support more actively the implementation of environmental labels, the development of sustainable production means (such as organic agriculture), and awareness campaigns on green purchasing. Businesses would commit to provide more transparent and complete information on the environmental impacts of their products/services.
|
| Page: | Comment213 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 22/09/2006 06:04AM (22/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | phil |
I vote you go ahead
|
| Page: | Comment212 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 22/09/2006 04:12AM (22/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | martin |
Could I suggest that this page is subdivided into invidual topics. My experience of trying to get collaboration through wikis is that they work best where each page covers just one topic. It also means that the structure of the knowledge is easier to change by simply changing the order of links. I look forward to contributing to the wiki, particularly on the water topic but would prefer to see it subdivided first. Or should I go ahead and move the water topic to a separate page?
|
| Page: | Comment211 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 20/09/2006 07:10AM (20/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | phil |
Hi Mike, not sure in what respect you'd like clarification? Just in the way that we might get some mutually agreed idea of how we - government and citizens - can tackle what needs to be tackled over waste, energy, water, etc. maybe we can do the same with what our response needs to be to climate change? Is there soemthing more specific you're getting at?
|
| Page: | Comment210 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 20/09/2006 05:21AM (20/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | mikeaporter |
Phil,
Could you clarify the link between this contract and the 'main ' Environment Contract?
|
Government willrecognise the inconvenient truth that as a nation we need to set ourselves more ambitious targetsin returnCitizens and communities will reconsider all lifestyle choices and focus on what it is we really need to make us healthier and happierand business will recognise the opportunity afforded by change to a low carbon economyReferences: The first draft of this article was first published on the Sustainable Community Action wiki
|
| Page: | Comment209 |
| Revision: | NEW |
| Last edited: | 15/09/2006 05:54AM (15/09/2006) |
| Edited by: | EnvironmentAdmin |
To all wiki users,
Admin have uploaded a newly drafted document to the Wiki. The document is entitled 'Political thought, one planet living and the environmental contract'. It was written by the Defra Science Strategy team and may be of some interest. The document has been uploaded to the Food for thought pages which can be accessed via the 'more' link in the left hand menu. regards, Admin
|